Three small nations — the former British High Commission Territories of Swaziland, Basutoland, and Bechuanaland — that achieved independence in 1967 and 1968 while entirely surrounded by or deeply embedded in the apartheid system. Their leaders had to negotiate independence from Britain while managing an impossible geographic and economic dependence on South Africa, producing a politics of extraordinary caution and occasional extraordinary courage.
The three British High Commission Territories of Basutoland, Bechuanaland, and Swaziland occupied a uniquely precarious position in the geography of southern African decolonisation. Entirely surrounded by South Africa or entirely dependent on it economically — Lesotho is a landlocked enclave within South Africa's borders, Botswana shares its longest border with apartheid's territory, and Swaziland was economically integrated into the South African system — these territories became independent states in 1966, 1967, and 1968 at the precise moment when apartheid was becoming more systematised and more violent. To decolonise under those conditions required a particular kind of political intelligence: the ability to assert sovereignty while avoiding the provocation of a neighbour that could close borders, cut rail links, withdraw migrant labour remittances, and destabilise governments at will. The leaders who navigated this situation did so with varying degrees of success, and the choices they made illuminate the outer limits of what small-state sovereignty could mean in southern Africa during the apartheid era.
Seretse Khama's story begins not in independence politics but in a personal scandal that became a geopolitical incident. In 1948 — the same year the National Party came to power in South Africa and apartheid became official policy — Khama, the hereditary chief of the Bangwato people of Bechuanaland and a law student at Oxford, married Ruth Williams, a white English woman. The marriage violated everything apartheid South Africa stood for, and Pretoria's reaction was immediate and furious: South Africa and Southern Rhodesia both threatened to break off relations with Britain if Khama was allowed to return to Bechuanaland as chief. Britain, needing South African gold and facing pressure from Rhodesia, responded by exiling Seretse Khama from his own country. He spent six years in exile in Britain, renounced his chieftaincy under pressure, and returned to Bechuanaland in 1956 as a private citizen. What the British and South African governments had expected to be an effective neutralisation of a potential troublemaker instead produced one of independent Africa's greatest statesmen. Khama built the Bechuanaland Democratic Party on a platform of multiracialism and pragmatic developmentalism, led Bechuanaland to independence as Botswana on 30 September 1966, and governed until his death in 1980 with a combination of democratic commitment, fiscal rectitude, and diplomatic skill that transformed a desperately poor, landlocked, drought-prone country into one of Africa's most stable and well-governed states.
Lesotho's independence politics were more turbulent. Ntsu Mokhehle, who founded the Basutoland Congress Party in 1952 on the model of the African National Congress, was the most radical and confrontational of the High Commission Territory leaders — a man who made no secret of his pan-Africanist politics, his support for the ANC, and his desire for a relationship with South Africa's liberation movement that went beyond diplomatic nicety. He won the pre-independence elections of 1965, or believed he did; when the results were contested and Leabua Jonathan's Basotho National Party was declared the winner with British and South African blessing, Mokhehle spent years in the political wilderness, the object of state harassment and periodic exile. Jonathan himself evolved in an unexpected direction after independence: initially amenable to South Africa, he became increasingly defiant as the 1970s and 1980s progressed, offering sanctuary to ANC cadres and allowing Lesotho's territory to be used as a transit route for the liberation movement. South Africa's response was to support the military coup that removed Jonathan in January 1986 — a reminder that no matter how carefully Lesotho's leaders tried to manage the relationship with Pretoria, ultimate leverage remained with the apartheid state.
Swaziland's independence took the form of a negotiation between the British colonial administration and the monarchy of King Sobhuza II — a figure of extraordinary political longevity who had reigned since 1921 and would continue to reign until 1982, making him one of the longest-serving monarchs in world history. Sobhuza's political genius was his ability to simultaneously accommodate British expectations, neutralise the threat from Swazi nationalist politicians who wanted a more democratic independence, and maintain the monarchy's central position in the new state. Independence came on 6 September 1968. Four years later, in 1973, Sobhuza suspended the constitution, banned political parties, and ruled by decree — arguing that Western-style multiparty democracy was alien to Swazi tradition. The argument was self-serving, but Sobhuza's authority was genuine enough that it was accepted. Swaziland — now Eswatini — remained an absolute monarchy, and the political space that independence might have opened remained foreclosed.
Michael Dingake and Motsamai Mpho represent the other dimension of these countries' freedom politics — not the formal independence leaders, but the individuals who crossed the border into South Africa and joined the liberation struggle directly. Dingake, a Motswana, was a senior ANC and MK operative who spent fifteen years on Robben Island alongside Nelson Mandela. Mpho was a Botswana nationalist politician who had also been active in ANC politics. Their presence in this archive is a reminder that the borders between Botswana, Lesotho, Swaziland, and South Africa were porous in both directions: South African exiles sheltered in the High Commission Territories, and citizens of those territories joined the South African liberation movement. The freedom of southern Africa was not, in the end, a series of national projects pursued in isolation but a regional struggle whose participants moved constantly across the boundaries that formal decolonisation had drawn.
10 profiles · click any name to open the full biography
Choose which cookies you're happy for us to use. You can change this at any time from the "Cookie Settings" link in the footer.