Amiri Baraka

Newark and Howard: The Formation of a Divided Man

Amiri Baraka was born Everett LeRoi Jones on 7 October 1934 in Newark, New Jersey, a city that was then still a functioning industrial centre — a place where Black families from the South had come to work in the factories and dockyards and who occupied a specific position in the city's racial hierarchy: present, numerous, economically necessary, and comprehensively excluded from the political and civic life their labour supported. His father was a postal supervisor, his mother a social worker; the family was middle class by the standards of Black Newark, which meant they had stability and aspiration and a very clear view of the ceiling above which aspiration was not permitted to rise.

He went to Howard University in Washington, D.C. — the historically Black university that produced more of the twentieth century's Black intellectual leadership than any other institution — and found it, in the mid-1950s, a place of performance rather than thought: a school that trained its students to move smoothly in the white professional world rather than to question the terms on which that world was organised. He dropped out and enlisted in the Air Force, served three years, was dishonourably discharged after the Air Force intercepted a letter he had written to a friend describing his communist sympathies — an experience that taught him something useful about the relationship between the state and political dissent that he would spend the rest of his life elaborating. He landed in Greenwich Village in 1957, in the middle of the Beat Generation's most fertile period, and became part of the downtown New York literary world.

The Village Years: Beats, Jazz, and the First Voice

The Greenwich Village into which Baraka arrived in the late 1950s was an extraordinary concentration of literary and artistic energy. He knew Allen Ginsberg, Frank O'Hara, Charles Olson, and the poets of the Black Mountain and New York schools who were collectively dismantling the formal conventions of mid-century American poetry and replacing them with something rawer, more immediate, more grounded in speech rhythms and direct perception. He edited the avant-garde literary magazine Yugen with his first wife, Hettie Cohen, and published the work that would establish him as a significant poet in his own right — work that was formally sophisticated, intellectually alive, and, crucially, racially ambiguous: it could be read without knowing it was written by a Black man, which was in the mid-1960s still a meaningful form of crossover success.

But the most important intellectual work Baraka did in the Village years was not the poetry — it was the music criticism. Blues People: Negro Music in White America, published in 1963, was a sustained argument that the history of African-American music — from the work songs of slavery through blues and gospel to bebop and free jazz — was not simply a musical history but a social and political one: a record of a people's response to their condition, a way of tracking the specific transformations in Black consciousness that political history alone could not capture. The book established Baraka as one of the serious analysts of American music and culture, and it introduced the central argument that would organise his subsequent career: that culture is not separate from politics but is one of the primary arenas in which politics is conducted.

Dutchman and the End of Integration

The play that made Baraka nationally famous — and that also marked the beginning of the end of his integrationist phase — was Dutchman, which premiered off-Broadway in March 1964 and won the Obie Award for best American play. The play is set in a New York subway car, where a white woman named Lula seduces and then kills a Black man named Clay, a middle-class Black intellectual who has worked to assimilate into white culture and who delivers, before his murder, a furious speech about the violence repressed behind Black accommodation. The speech was widely understood as Baraka speaking in his own voice, and the murder was widely understood as a parable about what assimilation costs: that the price of acceptance into white America is a form of death, and that the alternative — honest rage, unassimilated Blackness — is punished with a different form of death.

The play opened when the Civil Rights Movement was at its peak and the liberal consensus around integration was still largely intact among the white cultural establishment that had embraced Baraka's work. Dutchman cracked that consensus open by insisting that integration was not liberation but a trap — that the welcome extended to Black artists who could pass in white cultural spaces was conditional on their performing a version of Blackness that was palatable to white audiences, and that the performance required a suppression of the anger that the actual conditions of Black life in America produced. The audience that had embraced LeRoi Jones the downtown poet found Dutchman considerably less comfortable, and Baraka found, in writing it, that the discomfort was precisely the point.

Malcolm X and the Break

The assassination of Malcolm X on 21 February 1965 — shot dead at the Audubon Ballroom in Washington Heights while delivering a speech, killed by members of the Nation of Islam in what many believed was a more complex conspiracy involving federal intelligence agencies — was the event that forced the break that Dutchman had made intellectually inevitable. Baraka had known Malcolm, had been moved by the specificity and force of his analysis of racism as a systemic condition rather than a collection of individual prejudices, and had admired in him a quality he had found nowhere else in American political life: a willingness to say exactly what he thought was true regardless of the political cost, and a capacity to make Black audiences feel that their rage was legitimate rather than pathological.

Within weeks of Malcolm's death, Baraka left his white wife and his Greenwich Village life, moved to Harlem, and founded the Black Arts Repertory Theatre and School (BARTS) with a group of poets, artists, and activists committed to the idea that Black art had to serve Black liberation — that the aesthetic autonomy claimed by the white avant-garde was a luxury that Black artists could not afford, because the conditions of Black life in America were a political emergency that demanded political response. The BARTS produced plays, poetry readings, concerts, and art exhibitions in Harlem's streets and community spaces, taking the work to the community rather than waiting for the community to find its way to a theatre. It lasted less than two years — it was shut down in 1966 amid internal conflicts and, many believed, FBI disruption — but it established the model that chapters of the Black Arts Movement would replicate in cities across the country.

Spirit House and the Newark Crucible

Baraka returned to Newark in 1966 and founded Spirit House — a community arts centre, theatre, school, and political organisation that became the institutional base for his work for the next decade. Newark in 1966 was a city under severe pressure: the departure of white residents and businesses to the suburbs had hollowed out the tax base, the remaining Black population was overwhelmingly poor and under-served, and the police department was a predominantly white force that occupied the Black community with a level of violence and impunity that had been building toward crisis for years. The crisis arrived in July 1967, when the Newark riots — triggered by the beating of a Black cab driver by police — killed twenty-six people and caused damage that the city, already fiscally weakened, would take decades to absorb.

Baraka was arrested during the riots, charged with illegal possession of firearms, and beaten so severely by police that he required hospitalisation. The charges were eventually dismissed, but the experience and the riot itself deepened his conviction that the cultural politics he was practising at Spirit House had to connect with electoral and organisational politics in the city. He became a central figure in the effort to elect Kenneth Gibson as Newark's first Black mayor in 1970 — organising, fundraising, mobilising the Black community behind a candidacy that represented, however imperfectly, the possibility of Black institutional power in a city that was demographically majority Black but had never been governed by a Black mayor. Gibson won, and Baraka's role in the campaign established him as a serious political operator, not only a cultural one.

The Congress of African People and Pan-African Politics

The Congress of African People, which Baraka convened in Atlanta in September 1970, was an attempt to build a national Black political organisation that could coordinate the energy that Black Power had generated in cities across the United States into a coherent program for Black institutional power. The Congress brought together delegates from across the spectrum of Black political life — nationalists, Pan-Africanists, elected officials, community organisers, artists — and produced a set of principles and programmes that reflected Baraka's emerging synthesis of African cultural nationalism (strongly influenced by Maulana Karenga's US Organisation and the Kawaida philosophy that gave birth to Kwanzaa) and political organising at the municipal level.

The Congress fed into the National Black Political Assembly convened at Gary, Indiana, in March 1972 — the National Black Political Convention — which was the largest gathering of Black political delegates in American history to that point: some eight thousand people who produced the Gary Declaration, a document articulating a vision of Black political independence from both the Republican and Democratic parties. Baraka was one of the principal architects of the convention and of the declaration, and the Gary convention represented the peak of his influence as a national political organiser. It also represented, in retrospect, the limits of cultural nationalism as a political framework: the coalition that produced Gary fractured quickly over questions of integration versus separatism, electoral politics versus community organising, and the specific demands of the 1972 presidential election.

The Turn to Marxism and the Theoretical Break

By 1974, Baraka had concluded that cultural nationalism — the politics he had practised since 1965, which centred the transformation of Black consciousness and the construction of Black cultural institutions as the primary revolutionary task — was insufficient. His reading of Marx, Lenin, Mao, and the revolutionary movements of Africa and Asia had persuaded him that the analysis of race had to be embedded in an analysis of class, and that an organisation of Black people alone, however culturally united, could not challenge a capitalist system that exploited both Black and white workers and that used racial division as a mechanism to prevent the class solidarity that genuine transformation required.

The turn was announced publicly and was received with considerable hostility by the Black nationalist community that had followed him for a decade. His former allies in Karenga's US Organisation and in the cultural nationalist world charged him with abandonment, with capitulating to a Marxist framework that subordinated race to class in ways that had historically been used to dismiss the specific urgency of racial oppression. Baraka's counter-argument was that he was not dismissing race but situating it: that racism was a weapon that capitalism used, that its eradication required the transformation of the economic system that employed it, and that Black liberation required allies across racial lines who shared the class interests of Black workers even if they did not share their racial experience.

The Poetry as Evidence

Across all of Baraka's political phases, the poetry continued — and the poetry is the work that will outlast the political controversies and the organisational histories, because it is the work in which the analytical intelligence and the emotional intensity came together most completely. His early work — Preface to a Twenty Volume Suicide Note (1961) — showed a poet of genuine formal sophistication, working in the tradition of Olson and O'Hara but with a distinctive rhythmic intelligence and an emotional register that the white avant-garde did not quite have access to. The Black Arts period work — It's Nation Time (1970), Raise Race Rays Raze (1971) — was more explicitly political, often more directly rhetorical, and deliberately accessible to audiences that were not trained literary readers: it was poetry that was meant to be heard in community spaces, that worked through repetition and rhythm and the direct address of the spoken word rather than the compressed ambiguity of the page-lyric.

His later Marxist-period poetry synthesised both modes: the formal rigour of the early work with the political urgency of the Black Arts period, now directed toward a class analysis rather than a nationalist one. Blues People and Black Music remain essential texts in the analysis of African-American music, and Dutchman remains in the American theatrical repertoire as one of the few plays that made its political argument so viscerally that audiences could not decide whether they had witnessed a work of art or an act of aggression — a distinction that Baraka regarded as false.

New Jersey Laureate and the Final Controversy

In 2002, Baraka was appointed New Jersey Poet Laureate — a recognition by the state's cultural establishment of his fifty years of literary achievement. It lasted one year. His poem "Somebody Blew Up America," written in the aftermath of the 11 September 2001 attacks, included lines asking who had prior knowledge of the attacks — lines that were interpreted as repeating the conspiracy theory that Israel had been warned in advance and had told its citizens to stay away from the World Trade Center. The lines were widely condemned as antisemitic; Baraka refused to retract them or resign the laureateship; the state legislature voted to abolish the position of Poet Laureate rather than force him out directly.

The episode was, depending on your perspective, a final demonstration of Baraka's intransigence — his refusal, across six decades, to moderate his positions in response to political pressure — or a final demonstration of the state's intolerance for a political poet who refused to perform the kind of respectable radical that cultural institutions can accommodate without discomfort. It was probably both. He continued writing and organising until his death in Newark on 9 January 2014, aged seventy-nine, having spent his entire adult life in the service of a politics that the American cultural establishment alternately lionised and condemned and never quite knew what to do with. Newark buried him; the work remains.

Also Profiled — Black Power & Panthers